|Year : 2017 | Volume
| Issue : 3 | Page : 134-140
Awareness and uptake of human papillomavirus vaccines among female undergraduate students: Implications for cervical cancer prevention in South-South, Nigeria
Chibianotu Ojimah, Omosivie Maduka
Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, University of Port Harcourt, Harcourt, Nigeria
|Date of Submission||05-Apr-2017|
|Date of Acceptance||30-Sep-2017|
|Date of Web Publication||1-Aug-2018|
Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, University of Port Harcourt, Harcourt
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Background: Human papillomavirus (HPV) is a sexually transmitted infection found most commonly among sexually active adolescents and young women. HPV vaccine is available in Nigeria. However, very few persons have been vaccinated. This study, therefore, aimed to assess the level of awareness of HPV infection and its vaccine uptake among female university students in Rivers State. Methods: This was a descriptive cross-sectional study carried out between July and October 2015 in three Universities in Rivers State, Nigeria. Multistage sampling was used to identify the study participants. Results: A total of 780 eligible females were recruited into the study. About 262 (33.6%) had heard of HPV infection and 203 (26%) had heard of HPV vaccines. Among those who had heard of HPV vaccines, 148 (72.9%) were aware that the vaccine could protect against HPV infection while 97 (47.8%) were aware that the vaccine could protect against cervical cancer. Only 40 (5.1%) of study participants had been vaccinated with HPV vaccine. HPV vaccine uptake was significantly predicted by respondent's marital status (adjusted OR [AdjOR] = 0.061; 0.015–0.246), parity (AdjOR = 5.855; 1.433–23.923) and knowledge about HPV (AdjOR = 7.918; 3.062–20.475). Conclusion: Awareness of HPV infection and HPV vaccine among female undergraduates in Rivers State is poor. There is, therefore, need for health promotion interventions that address this gap as part of cervical cancer control activities.
Keywords: Cervical cancer, human papilloma virus vaccine, human papillomavirus, undergraduates, uptake
|How to cite this article:|
Ojimah C, Maduka O. Awareness and uptake of human papillomavirus vaccines among female undergraduate students: Implications for cervical cancer prevention in South-South, Nigeria. Port Harcourt Med J 2017;11:134-40
|How to cite this URL:|
Ojimah C, Maduka O. Awareness and uptake of human papillomavirus vaccines among female undergraduate students: Implications for cervical cancer prevention in South-South, Nigeria. Port Harcourt Med J [serial online] 2017 [cited 2023 Oct 3];11:134-40. Available from: https://www.phmj.org/text.asp?2017/11/3/134/237877
| Introduction|| |
Human papillomavirus (HPV) is a sexually transmitted infection (STI) found most commonly among sexually active adolescents and young women. It can infect any woman irrespective of the age group. There are many types of HPV, many of which have not been associated with problems. Most HPV infections usually clear up within a few months or years of acquisition without any interventions. Some can persist and progress to cancer such as cancer of the anus, vulva, vagina, cervix or penis. Cervical cancer, however, is by far the most common HPV-related cancer, and nearly, all cases of cervical cancer are attributed to HPV infection. HPV high-risk types 16 and 18 have been implicated in the aetiology of cervical cancer in approximately 70% of cases.,
New vaccines have been developed to protect against HPV infection and cervical cancer. These vaccines were produced through a combination of genetic material from more than one origin, and do not contain any biological product or DNA. Thus, they are non-infectious. The HPV vaccines target 'high risk' HPV types 16 and 18 and 'low risk' HPV types 6 and 11. On completion of clinical trials, two vaccines (Gardasil and Cervarix) were commercially released in government-sponsored vaccination programmes that targeted women, girls and even boys as young as 9 years of age. The vaccines are believed to be about 98% effective against HPV types 6, 11, 16 and 18, given in three doses over a 6-month period. However, a vaccine which targets both HPV strains 16 and 18 and is proven to be 92% effective with more than 4 years potency is both licensed and available in Nigeria.
Vaccination with HPV vaccines does not protect women with pre-existing infection, and may even leave them more susceptible to other forms of oncogenic HPV types. Thus, cervical cancer should be ruled out through Pap smear More Details test before the administration of HPV vaccine. Infection with HPV at a young age could be very dangerous because the virus tends to have more time to cause damage that will eventually lead to cancer. Despite vaccination, women still need to continue screening for cervical cancer.
Despite the fact that human papillomavirus vaccine is available in Nigeria very few persons have been vaccinated. We, therefore, aimed to assess the level of awareness of HPV infection, and its vaccine uptake among female university students in Rivers State. Although the target population for HPV vaccination in developing countries is 10–14-year-old girls, this study focuses on female undergraduates because they are at risk of contracting HPV infection.
| Materials and Methods|| |
This study was a descriptive cross-sectional study conducted in Rivers State, an oil-rich state in the south of Nigeria. The population of Rivers State according to the 2006 census figures is 5,185,400, which makes it the sixth-most populated state in Nigeria., There are four universities in the State: the University of Port Harcourt, the Rivers State University of Science and Technology, the Rivers State University of Education (Ignatius Ajuru University) and the Madonna University, Elele.
We conducted the study among full-time female undergraduate students in the state, aged between 15 and 45 years. Student's matriculation number or school identification card was used to qualify the selected female students into the study. We excluded female students without any form of identification. We calculated sample size using the formula for descriptive cross-sectional study with 95% confidence interval, given as 1.96, the proportion of HPV awareness (p) used from a previous study was 48.7%, precision of 5% and 10% inflation for non-response. The calculated sample size of 384 females was multiplied by two to cater for design effect due to multistage sampling to give a final sample of 845 females.
We used a multistage sampling technique to select participants from the study population. In the first stage, we obtained a list of all the universities in Rivers State from which we selected three universities through simple random sampling, using balloting. The selected universities were Rivers State University of Science and Technology Nkpolu-Oroworukwo Port Harcourt, Ignatius Ajuru University of Education Rumuolumeni, and the University of Port Harcourt, Choba, Port Harcourt. Two hundred and eighty-two study participants were recruited from each university by disproportionate probability sampling method. In the second stage, we prepared a list of all the faculties in each selected university and selected five faculties by simple random sampling. We then selected 57 females from each of the selected faculties. In the third stage, we prepared a list of all the departments in each selected faculty and selected three departments through simple random sampling. In the final stage, we selected 19 females from each of the selected departments using systematic sampling method. The sampling interval (k) was calculated using the formula (k = N/n), where N is the population of female students in each department, and n is the number of the study participants required to be sampled from the department. We selected the first study participants from each department by simple random sampling, while others followed the order of the calculated sampling interval.
We collected data using a self-administered questionnaire. The questionnaire consisted of three sections as follows: Section A (sociodemographic characteristics), Section B (awareness of cervical cancer, HPV infection and HPV vaccines) and Section C (HPV vaccine uptake). We pre-tested the questionnaire on female students from another institution not included in the study. Data collection was done for 2 months from 4 May to 29 June 2015.
Knowledge scores were awarded to participant's responses to questions concerning cervical cancer, HPV infection and HPV vaccines. Participants who had heard of cervical cancer and responded correctly to at least two questions (out of three) about cervical cancer were classified as having good knowledge about cervical cancer. Participants who had heard of HPV and correctly got at least three questions (out of four) about HPV and the HPV vaccine were classified as having good knowledge of HPV and HPV vaccine, respectively. Participants who did not meet the set cut-off score were classified as having poor knowledge about cervical cancer, HPV or the vaccine. We defined HPV vaccination as taking at least one dose of the vaccine. This was intended to capture all those who had ever taken the vaccine.
Data collected was coded and entered into Microsoft Excel 2013 and analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20.0 owned by IBM SPSS Statistics; as acquired on 31st October 2015 by UNICOM Systems Inc., a division of UNICOM Global, under the UNICOM Intelligence brand. The analysed results on the study participants' sociodemographic characteristics and outcome variables were summarised using descriptive summary measures; including mean and standard deviation for continuous variable and percentages for categorical variables. Chi-squared test was used to determine the association between categorical variables. Binary logistical regression was used to test for significant predictors of uptake of the vaccine, and odds ratio was used to determine the statistical significance and strength of association. We set the level of significance at 5% (using 2-tailed tests) with a confidence interval of 95%, and the associated P value reported in two decimal places with P < 0.05 considered statistically significant.
Approval for the study was obtained from the Research Ethics Committee of the University of Port Harcourt. We also obtained informed consent from the study participants before questionnaire administration and ensured confidentiality of data.
| Results|| |
A total of 780 females returned adequately filled questionnaires giving a response rate of 92.3%. The age of respondents ranged from 15 to 41 years with an average age of 21.9 ± 3.7 years. Only 108 (13.8%) of the respondents were married, whereas 455 (58.3%) were sexually active as at the time of the study. Almost half, i.e., 375 (48.1%) of the respondents who were sexually active had their first sexual debut on or before the age of 18 years. The mean age at which respondents had their first sexual intercourse was 18.2 ± 3.5 years [Table 1].
Only 455 (58.3%) of the study participants had heard of cervical cancer. Among the 455 respondents who had ever heard of cervical cancer, 150 (33%) were aware that cervical cancer could be sexually transmitted, and 135 (29.7%) were aware that cervical cancer could be screened through Pap smear test. Two hundred and sixty-two (33.6%) of the students had heard of HPV infection, and 203 (26%) had heard of the vaccine. Among the students who had heard of HPV infection, 182 (69.4%) were aware that the infection could be sexually transmitted and 133 (50.8%) were aware that the infection could cause cervical cancer. Most of the students (92.7%) who had heard of HPV infection knew at least one risk factor for the infection. Respondents listed multiple sex partners 117 (44.7%) and sexual debut before 18 years of age 36 (13.7%), as the top risk factors for HPV infection. Among the study participants who had heard of HPV vaccine 148 (72.9%) were aware that the vaccine could protect against HPV infection and 97 (12.4%) were aware that the vaccine could protect against cervical cancer. A total of 165 (81.3%) participants were aware that the vaccine is available in Nigeria [Table 2].
Using the scoring criteria, we found knowledge about cervical cancer, HPV infection and HPV vaccine to be poor; 25.4%, 26.2% and 18.3%, respectively.
Only 40 (5.1%) of the students had received at least one dose of HPV vaccine [Figure 1]. Bivariate analysis showed that HPV vaccine uptake was significantly associated with participant's marital status (P < 0.001), parity (P < 0.001), sexual activity (P = 0.028), knowledge of cervical cancer, HPV infection and its vaccine (P < 0.001) [Table 3]. Binary logistic regression analysis was used to determine the significant predictors of HPV vaccine uptake. All the variables that were significantly associated with HPV vaccine uptake, as well as those close to significance, were initially included in the regression analysis model. From the model, the variables that significantly predicted HPV vaccine uptake were marital status (adjusted OR [AdjOR] = 0.061; 0.015–0.246), parity (AdjOR = 5.855; 1.433–23.923) and knowledge about HPV (AdjOR = 7.918; 3.062–20.475) [Table 4]. Further analysis was conducted to identify the factors associated with HPV vaccine uptake among female undergraduates who had never had sex before, as at the time of the study, and it was found that respondent's knowledge about HPV infection and their knowledge about the vaccine were significantly associated with HPV vaccine uptake among non-sexually active female student; P = 0.011 and P < 0.001, respectively [Table 5]. When this finding was subjected to binary logistic regression, only respondent's knowledge about HPV vaccine significantly predicted HPV vaccine uptake among non-sexually active female students (AdjOR = 0.177; 0.036–0.873) [Table 6].
|Figure 1: Pie chart showing uptake of at least one dose of HPV vaccine among female undergraduates |
Click here to view
|Table 4: Predictors of uptake of HPV vaccine among female undergraduates|
Click here to view
|Table 5: Uptake of HPV vaccine among non-sexually active female undergraduates|
Click here to view
|Table 6: Predictors of uptake of HPV vaccine among non-sexually active female undergraduates|
Click here to view
| Discussion|| |
Findings from this study reveal a low level of awareness among the study population about cervical cancer, HPV and the HPV vaccine. Only 5% of the study participants had taken at least one dose of HPV vaccination. However, the majority of those not vaccinated were willing to be vaccinated and refer others for vaccination. Regression analysis showed that marital status, parity and knowledge about cervical cancer and HPV were significantly related to HPV vaccination. Knowledge remained a significant predictor of HPV vaccination among the study participants who had never had sex.
Our research findings concerning awareness of cervical cancer are in agreement with findings from similar studies in Nigeria ,, in contrast to the study findings from more developed countries which show higher levels of awareness of cervical cancer, HPV and the HPV vaccine.,, We also found evidence in the literature of low awareness of HPV in low- and high-income countries alike.,,,, Furthermore, one review article found low levels of awareness of cervical cancer, HPV and HPV vaccine in low- and high-income countries. Findings from other studies are also similar to our findings regarding a high acceptance of HPV vaccine among the study participants.,,,,,
The predictors of willingness to receive HPV vaccination identified in this study are similar to findings from a South African researcher who found knowledge about Pap smear test, knowledge of risk factors for cervical cancer (such as having multiple sex partners, sexual intercourse before the age of 18 years, smoking, and having contracted any sexually transmitted diseases) as significant predictors of willingness to receive HPV vaccination. However, other studies identified partner's approval, history of the gynaecological disease, and one's mother having experienced cancer as factors that significantly predicted acceptability of HPV vaccination.,,,
The burden of cervical cancer in developing countries is significant as cervical cancer has been identified as the second most prevalent cancer of women.,, Cervical cancer screening and HPV vaccination are useful preventive tools. HPV vaccination is no longer new in Nigeria, having been introduced several years ago. The low levels of knowledge and lower levels of uptake are, therefore, not acceptable. This underscores the need to improve information, education and communication about cervical cancer prevention among most at-risk populations. The study findings point to the fact that if more women knew about cervical cancer and its prevention, especially HPV vaccination, they would be willing to receive it.
Although the target age for cervical cancer vaccination has been identified as 10–14 years, this study population of undergraduate students aged between 15 and 41 years represent women of reproductive age at risk of STIs such as HPV and its sequelae of cervical cancer. For instance, the HIV prevalence in these age groups ranged between 2.9% and 4.4%, according to the 2012 National HIV and AIDS reproductive health survey.
This study did not evaluate the accessibility of cervical cancer prevention services, especially HPV vaccination, as we sought to focus on demand-side factors for cervical cancer vaccination. However, it is important that as interventions to improve knowledge and demand for HPV vaccination are implemented, public health authorities also make adequate provision for HPV vaccine to be available and affordable.
| Conclusion|| |
Awareness and uptake of HPV vaccination in this study population are unacceptably low. However, the study participants have a good perception of risk and showed willingness to take advantage of vaccination services. Public health authorities, therefore, need to implement information, education and communication interventions among at-risk populations.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Richardson H, Kelsall G, Tellier P, Voyer H, Abrahamowicz M, Ferenczy A, et al.
The natural history of type-specific human papillomavirus infections in female university students. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2003;12:485-90.
Dahlstrom LA, Tran TN, Lundholm C, Young C, Sundstrom K, Sparen P. Attitude to HPV vaccination among parents of children aged 12-15 years – A population-based survey in Sweden. Int J Cancer 2010;26:500-7.
Di Giuseppe G, Abbate R, Liguori G, Albano L, Angelillo IF. Human papillomavirus and vaccination: Knowledge, attitudes, and behavior intervention in adolescents and young women in Italy. Br J Cancer 2008;99:225-9.
Walboomers JM, Jacobs MV, Manos MM, Bosch FX, Kummer JA, Shah KV, et al.
Human papillomavirus is a necessary cause of invasive cervical cancer worldwide. J Pathol 1999;189:12-9.
Odetola TD, Ekpo K. Nigerian women's perceptions about human papilloma virus immunization. J Community Med Health Educ 2012;2:191.
Cummins J, Mae-Wan H. The HPV vaccine controversy. Sci Soc 2009;42:15-20.
Haug CJ. Human papillomavirus vaccination – A reason for caution. N Engl J Med 2008;59:861-2.
Akanbi OA, Iyanda A, Osundare F, Opaleye OO. Perceptions of Nigerian Women about Human Papilloma Virus, Cervical Cancer, and HPV Vaccine. Scientifica 2015; 285702:4.
Hildesheim A, Herrero R, Wacholder S, Rodriguez AC, Solomon D, Bratti MC, et al.
Effect of human papillomavirus 16/18 L1 viruslike particle vaccine among young women with preexisting infection: A randomized trial. JAMA 2007;298:743-53.
Ezenwa BN, Balogun MR, Okafor IP. Mothers' human papilloma virus knowledge and willingness to vaccinate their adolescent daughters in Lagos, Nigeria. Int J Womens Health 2013;5:371-7.
Hoque ME, Ghuman S, Hal GV. Human papillomavirus vaccination acceptability among female university students in South Africa. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2013;14:4865-9.
Kola MO, Adeola FA, Lawrence AA, Oluseyi OA. Human papillomavirus vaccine: Knowledge, attitude and perception of parents in Southwest Nigeria. Med Sci Public Health 2013;1:13-9.
Kamzol W, Jaglarz K, Tomaszewski KA, Puskulluoglu M, Krzemieniecki K. Assessment of knowledge about cervical cancer and its prevention among female students aged 17-26 years. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2013;166:196-203.
Lenselink CH, Schmeink CE, Melchers WJ, Massuger LF, Hendriks JC, van Hamont D, et al.
Young adults and acceptance of the human papillomavirus vaccine. Public Health 2008;122:1295-301.
Iliyasu Z, Abubakar IS, Aliyu MH, Galadanci HS. Cervical cancer risk perception and predictors of human papilloma virus vaccine acceptance among female university students in Northern Nigeria. J Obstet Gynaecol 2010;30:857-62.
Marek E, Dergez T, Rebek-Nagy G, Kricskovics A, Kovacs K, Bozsa S, et al.
Adolescents' awareness of HPV infections and attitudes towards HPV vaccination 3 years following the introduction of the HPV vaccine in Hungary. Vaccine 2011;29:8591-8.
Saha A, Chaudhury AN, Bhowmik P, Chatterjee R. Awareness of cervical cancer among female students of premier colleges in Kolkata, India. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2010;11:1085-90.
Hopkins TG, Wood N. Female human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination: Global uptake and the impact of attitudes. Vaccine 2013;31:1673-9.
Perkins RB, Langrish SM, Cotton DJ, Simon CJ. Maternal support for human papillomavirus vaccination in Honduras. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2011;20:85-90.
Gerend MA, Magloire ZF. Awareness, knowledge, and beliefs about human papillomavirus in a racially diverse sample of young adults. J Adolesc Health 2008;42:237-42.
Hoover DR, Carfioli B, Moench EA. Attitudes of adolescent/young adult women towards human papillomavirus vaccination and clinical trials. Health Care Women Int 2000;21:375-91.
Marlow LA, Waller J, Wardle J. Parental attitudes to pre-pubertal HPV vaccination. Vaccine 2007;25:1945-52.
Hsu YY, Fetzer SJ, Hsu KF, Chang YY, Huang CP, Chou CY, et al.
Intention to obtain human papillomavirus vaccination among Taiwanese undergraduate women. Sex Transm Dis 2009;36:686-92.
Kwan TT, Chan KK, Yip AM, Tam KF, Cheung AN, Lo SS, et al.
Acceptability of human papillomavirus vaccination among Chinese women: Concerns and implications. BJOG 2009;116:501-10.
Federal Ministry of Health (Nigeria). National HIV & AIDS and Reproductive Health Survey 2012 (NARHS Plus). FMOH; November, 2013.
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5], [Table 6]
|This article has been cited by|
||HPV Vaccination Prevalence among Lebanese Female University Students: A Cross-Sectional Study
| ||Joey El Khoury, Rami Halabi, Mira Hleyhel, Wafaa El Rahman Kishly, Raghid El Khoury, Nadine Saleh, Giovanna Deiana |
| ||Journal of Environmental and Public Health. 2023; 2023: 1 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Correlates of human papillomavirus vaccine knowledge and acceptability among medical and allied health students in Northern Nigeria
| ||Zubairu Iliyasu,Hadiza S. Galadanci,Aisha Muhammad,Bilkisu Z. Iliyasu,Amina A. Umar,Muktar H. Aliyu |
| ||Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2021; : 1 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Modeling for Predictors of Knowledge Score on Etiology and Prevention Strategies for Cervical Cancer Among Women of Reproductive Age in Ibadan
| ||Imran O. Morhason-Bello,Yusuf Olushola Kareem,Isaac F. Adewole |
| ||JCO Global Oncology. 2020; (6): 892 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Knowledge of HPV and HPV vaccine among senior secondary school students in Nigeria: Implications on
cancer prevention strategies, the CHANCE Study
| ||Omotayo Fagbule,Kehinde Kanmodi,Emmanuel Aliemeke,Kayode Ogunniyi,Mike Ogbeide,Samuel Victor,Taiwo Isola,Habeeb Adewuyi,Semeeh Omoleke,Precious Kanmodi |
| ||Population Medicine. 2020; 2(October): 1 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|